Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCIX vs SHSAX
FHCIX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.57B vs. FHCIX (3.31B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: SHSAX (0.27) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCIX (29 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FHCIX (0.68). FHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). FHCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCIX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.27 vs. FHCIX (2.31). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : -10.66 vs. SHSAX (-11.69).
| FHCIX | SHSAX | FHCIX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.09 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.09 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.743 | 1.900 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.31B | 6.57B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.31 | 4.27 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.87 | 0.78 | -112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.66 | -11.69 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.29 | 52.04 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers