Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCIX vs FSPHX
FHCIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. FHCIX (3.52B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: FSPHX (0.01) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCIX (29 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCIX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FHCIX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.06 vs. FHCIX (3.26). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.09 vs. FSPHX (-2.91).
| FHCIX | FSPHX | FHCIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.019 | 13.211 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.52B | 6.67B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 4.06 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.29 | 12.41 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.09 | -2.91 | -140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.25 | 48.73 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement