Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs SHSAX
FHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.29B vs. FHCCX (3.28B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: SHSAX (0.22) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FHCCX (28 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FHCCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.80 vs. FHCCX (-16.41). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -10.98 vs. FHCCX (-14.82).
| FHCCX | SHSAX | FHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.09 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.09 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.183 | 1.666 | 431% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 6.29B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.41 | -11.80 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.68 | 4.78 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.82 | -10.98 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.64 | 25.76 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers