Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs PRHSX
FHCCX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. PRHSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Hold and PRHSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. FHCCX (3.27B). PRHSX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: PRHSX (0.01) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FHCCX (28 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than PRHSX (0.80). PRHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.40 vs. FHCCX (37.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FHCCX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). PRHSX (-20.51) and FHCCX (-21.46) have marching annual gain over last year. PRHSX return over 5 years is better than : -12.52 vs. FHCCX (-17.85).
| FHCCX | PRHSX | FHCCX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.80 | 211% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.80 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.205 | -0.038 | 544% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.27B | 10.8B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.46 | -20.51 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.47 | -4.45 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.85 | -12.52 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.23 | 15.11 | 260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers