Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs JNGLX
FHCCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.95B vs. FHCCX (3.3B). JNGLX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: JNGLX (0.31) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FHCCX (28 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FHCCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.52 vs. FHCCX (-10.60). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.51 vs. FHCCX (-15.61).
| FHCCX | JNGLX | FHCCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.80 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.80 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.724 | 19.237 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 4.95B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.60 | 4.52 | -234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.63 | 26.51 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.61 | 15.51 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.26 | 53.52 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers