Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCCX vs FSPHX
FHCCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. FHCCX (3.28B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FHCCX (0.00). FHCCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FHCCX (28 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FHCCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.34 vs. FHCCX (-15.74). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.17 vs. FHCCX (-17.39).
| FHCCX | FSPHX | FHCCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.63 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.63 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.106 | 5.248 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 5.96B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.74 | -9.34 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.82 | 8.16 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.39 | -13.17 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.43 | 38.70 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers