Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGTAX vs RWMFX
FGTAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FGTAX vs RWMFX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock A
Price$28.74
Change-$0.20 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.7B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
FGTAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGTAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGTAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. FGTAX (4.7B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FGTAX: RWMFX (1.43) vs FGTAX (0.67). FGTAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FGTAX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). FGTAX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FGTAX (9.00). FGTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FGTAX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FGTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.07 vs. RWMFX (7.95). FGTAX return over 5 years is better than : 111.66 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| FGTAX | RWMFX | FGTAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.31 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.31 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.460 | 8.213 | 176% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 205B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.43 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.07 | 7.95 | 278% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.28 | 34.82 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.66 | 50.81 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.20 | 83.34 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement