Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs PMBPX
FGSKX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs PMBPX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$54.16
Change-$6.05 (-10.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.86B
FGSKX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. PMBPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Hold and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.3B vs. FGSKX (5.86B). FGSKX (0.00) and PMBPX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSKX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FGSKX (19 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). FGSKX (0.88) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBPX (13.70). FGSKX (0) and PMBPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.90 vs. PMBPX (-11.17). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 12.76 vs. FGSKX (12.11).
| FGSKX | PMBPX | FGSKX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.83 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.83 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.061 | -2.931 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 30.3B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.90 | -11.17 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.12 | 21.00 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.11 | 12.76 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.23 | 119.39 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement