Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs PMBPX
FGSKX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs PMBPX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$56.43
Change-$0.65 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
FGSKX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and PMBPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. FGSKX (3.96B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FGSKX (19 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). FGSKX (0) and PMBPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.10 vs. PMBPX (10.26). PMBPX (54.31) and FGSKX (51.73) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGSKX | PMBPX | FGSKX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.83 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.83 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.452 | 1.933 | 334% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 30.6B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.10 | 10.26 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.50 | 49.52 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.73 | 54.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.02 | 92.68 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement