Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs PMBMX
FGSKX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs PMBMX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$59.33
Change+$0.71 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.33B
FGSKX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. PMBMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Hold and PMBMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. FGSKX (4.33B). PMBMX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: PMBMX (0.02) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: FGSKX (19 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). PMBMX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FGSKX (0.90). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). FGSKX (0) and PMBMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.97 vs. PMBMX (13.04). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.44 vs. FGSKX (46.35).
| FGSKX | PMBMX | FGSKX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.14 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.14 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.922 | 8.421 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 33.2B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.97 | 13.04 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.38 | 47.27 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.35 | 52.44 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.57 | 97.42 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement