Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs PMBCX
FGSKX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs PMBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$60.10
Change+$0.72 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.27B
FGSKX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. PMBCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Hold and PMBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 31.9B vs. FGSKX (5.27B). FGSKX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSKX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: FGSKX (19 years) vs PMBCX (19 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FGSKX (0.90). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). FGSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMBCX: FGSKX (0) vs PMBCX (1000). FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.03 vs. PMBCX (-4.45). FGSKX return over 5 years is better than : 32.25 vs. PMBCX (25.71).
| FGSKX | PMBCX | FGSKX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.75 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.75 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.017 | 1.538 | 781% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.27B | 31.9B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.03 | -4.45 | -338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.98 | 42.56 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.25 | 25.71 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.54 | 73.94 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement