Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSIX vs RPMGX
FGSIX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSIX vs RPMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth IS
Price$69.75
Change+$0.15 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.86B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$103.21
Change+$0.33 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
FGSIX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSIX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSIX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. FGSIX (4.86B). FGSIX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSIX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: FGSIX (16 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). FGSIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). FGSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSIX: RPMGX (2500) vs FGSIX (1000000). FGSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.65 vs. RPMGX (-2.48). FGSIX return over 5 years is better than : 52.33 vs. RPMGX (3.03).
| FGSIX | RPMGX | FGSIX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.75 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.75 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.591 | 3.489 | 361% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.86B | 27.4B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.65 | -2.48 | -1,198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.17 | 14.45 | 575% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.33 | 3.03 | 1,730% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.82 | 29.98 | 203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement