Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs VMGMX
FGSCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs VMGMX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.52
Change+$0.10 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$122.54
Change+$1.07 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.11B
FGSCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. FGSCX (5.38B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: VMGMX (0.64) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: FGSCX (30 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). FGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: FGSCX (1500) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.93 vs. FGSCX (-6.25). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.34 vs. FGSCX (-13.54).
| FGSCX | VMGMX | FGSCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.07 | 2,786% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.07 | 2,829% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.842 | 10.865 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.38B | 33.1B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.25 | 3.93 | -159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.22 | 46.01 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.54 | 38.34 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.02 | 178.10 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement