Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs VMGIX
FGSCX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs VMGIX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$23.94
Change-$4.46 (-15.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.86B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$107.31
Change-$8.92 (-7.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.91B
FGSCX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. VMGIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Hold and VMGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 31.9B vs. FGSCX (5.86B). VMGIX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: VMGIX (0.52) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: FGSCX (30 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). FGSCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). FGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGIX: FGSCX (1500) vs VMGIX (3000). VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. FGSCX (-10.60). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.77 vs. FGSCX (-22.65).
| FGSCX | VMGIX | FGSCX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.19 | 1,026% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.19 | 1,037% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.126 | -2.259 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 31.9B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.60 | 1.12 | -946% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.13 | 36.95 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.65 | 23.77 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.57 | 213.16 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers