Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs RPTIX
FGSCX vs RPTIX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs RPTIX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$28.34
Change+$0.15 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.89B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$103.91
Change+$0.61 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
FGSCX vs RPTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. RPTIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and RPTIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. FGSCX (4.89B). RPTIX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: RPTIX (0.05) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than RPTIX: FGSCX (30 years) vs RPTIX (10 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). FGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: FGSCX (1500) vs RPTIX (500000). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.72 vs. RPTIX (-2.32). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.58 vs. FGSCX (2.25).
| FGSCX | RPTIX | FGSCX / RPTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.63 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.63 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.776 | 3.589 | 328% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.89B | 27.4B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.72 | -2.32 | -938% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.90 | 14.96 | 427% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.25 | 3.58 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.50 | 31.10 | -59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers