Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PMBPX
FGSCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PMBPX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$26.72
Change-$0.30 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
FGSCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31B vs. FGSCX (3.96B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PMBPX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.58 vs. PMBPX (10.26). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 54.31 vs. FGSCX (8.12).
| FGSCX | PMBPX | FGSCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.83 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.83 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.137 | 1.933 | 369% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 31B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.58 | 10.26 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.69 | 49.52 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.12 | 54.31 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.07 | 92.68 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers