Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PMBMX
FGSCX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PMBMX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$28.05
Change+$0.33 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.33B
FGSCX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PMBMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Hold and PMBMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. FGSCX (4.33B). PMBMX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: PMBMX (0.02) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PMBMX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. PMBMX (13.04). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.44 vs. FGSCX (3.12).
| FGSCX | PMBMX | FGSCX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.14 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.221 | 8.421 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 33.2B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 13.04 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.11 | 47.27 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.12 | 52.44 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.63 | 97.42 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement