Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PMBJX
FGSCX vs PMBJX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PMBJX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$26.72
Change-$0.30 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
FGSCX vs PMBJX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PMBJX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PMBJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 31B vs. FGSCX (3.96B). PMBJX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: PMBJX (0.06) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than PMBJX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PMBJX (24 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBJX (10.50). PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PMBJX (1000) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.58 vs. PMBJX (10.12). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 53.13 vs. FGSCX (8.12).
| FGSCX | PMBJX | FGSCX / PMBJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.78 | 250% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.78 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.137 | 1.960 | 364% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 31B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.58 | 10.12 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.69 | 48.96 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.12 | 53.13 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.07 | 88.94 | -29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers