Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PMBCX
FGSCX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PMBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$26.72
Change-$0.30 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
FGSCX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PMBCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PMBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 31B vs. FGSCX (3.96B). FGSCX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSCX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PMBCX (18 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PMBCX (1.75). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PMBCX (1000) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.58 vs. PMBCX (9.12). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.73 vs. FGSCX (8.12).
| FGSCX | PMBCX | FGSCX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.75 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.75 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.137 | 1.538 | 464% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 31B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.58 | 9.12 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.69 | 42.85 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.12 | 42.73 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.07 | 65.54 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers