Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PMAQX
FGSCX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PMAQX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.52
Change+$0.10 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
FGSCX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PMAQX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. FGSCX (5.38B). PMAQX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: PMAQX (0.19) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PMAQX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.25 vs. PMAQX (-7.63). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 29.11 vs. FGSCX (-13.54).
| FGSCX | PMAQX | FGSCX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.59 | 331% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.59 | 336% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.842 | 1.972 | 448% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.38B | 31.6B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.25 | -7.63 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.22 | 33.37 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.54 | 29.11 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement