Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PEMGX
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PEMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.40
Change-$0.67 (-2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.26B
FGSCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. FGSCX (5.26B). FGSCX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.72 vs. PEMGX (-5.01). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 30.49 vs. FGSCX (-7.11).
| FGSCX | PEMGX | FGSCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.91 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.91 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.301 | 2.816 | 401% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.26B | 32B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.72 | -5.01 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.81 | 34.17 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.11 | 30.49 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.26 | 103.52 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers