Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PCBIX
FGSCX vs PCBIX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PCBIX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.40
Change-$0.67 (-2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.26B
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.92
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.95B
FGSCX vs PCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PCBIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PCBIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. FGSCX (5.26B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: PCBIX (0.12) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than PCBIX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PCBIX (25 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PCBIX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.72 vs. PCBIX (-4.65). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. FGSCX (-7.11).
| FGSCX | PCBIX | FGSCX / PCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.67 | 291% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.67 | 296% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.301 | 3.029 | 373% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.26B | 32B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.72 | -4.65 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.81 | 35.68 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.11 | 33.05 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.26 | 111.81 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers