Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PCBIX
FGSCX vs PCBIX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PCBIX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.52
Change+$0.10 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.58
Change+$0.35 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.57B
FGSCX vs PCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PCBIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and PCBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. FGSCX (5.38B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: PCBIX (0.12) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than PCBIX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PCBIX (25 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PCBIX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.25 vs. PCBIX (-7.72). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 28.55 vs. FGSCX (-13.54).
| FGSCX | PCBIX | FGSCX / PCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.67 | 291% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.67 | 296% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.842 | 1.907 | 464% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.38B | 31.6B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.25 | -7.72 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.22 | 33.03 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.54 | 28.55 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.02 | 101.44 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement