Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs FSMAX
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.52
Change+$0.10 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.38
Change+$1.40 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. FGSCX (5.38B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSCX (30 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: FSMAX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.33 vs. FGSCX (-6.25). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.03 vs. FGSCX (-13.54).
| FGSCX | FSMAX | FGSCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.04 | 5,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.04 | 5,657% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.842 | 11.125 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.38B | 41B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.25 | 3.33 | -188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.22 | 51.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.54 | 33.03 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.02 | 101.82 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement