Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs FSMAX
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$23.94
Change-$4.46 (-15.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.86B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. FGSCX (5.86B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: FSMAX (0.56) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSCX (30 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: FSMAX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. FGSCX (-10.60). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. FGSCX (-22.65).
| FGSCX | FSMAX | FGSCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.04 | 5,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.04 | 5,629% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.126 | 3.050 | -70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 40.6B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.60 | 10.51 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.13 | 48.06 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.65 | 19.23 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.57 | 157.02 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers