Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PMBCX
FGSAX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PMBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$64.88
Change+$0.14 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.86B
FGSAX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PMBCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PMBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. FGSAX (4.86B). FGSAX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: FGSAX (41 years) vs PMBCX (19 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FGSAX (1.27). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PMBCX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.91 vs. PMBCX (7.45). FGSAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.32 vs. PMBCX (36.28).
| FGSAX | PMBCX | FGSAX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.75 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.366 | 6.382 | 194% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.86B | 33B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.91 | 7.45 | 388% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.82 | 39.54 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.32 | 36.28 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.47 | 81.79 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement