Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PMBCX
FGSAX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PMBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$61.38
Change-$0.71 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
FGSAX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PMBCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PMBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. FGSAX (3.96B). FGSAX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: FGSAX (41 years) vs PMBCX (18 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FGSAX (1.27). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PMBCX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.15 vs. PMBCX (9.12). FGSAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.03 vs. PMBCX (42.73).
| FGSAX | PMBCX | FGSAX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.75 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.304 | 1.538 | 410% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 30.6B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.15 | 9.12 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.87 | 42.85 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.03 | 42.73 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.88 | 65.54 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement