Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PEMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$64.88
Change+$0.14 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.86B
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PEMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. FGSAX (4.86B). FGSAX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSAX (41 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). FGSAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). FGSAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.91 vs. PEMGX (9.01). FGSAX (47.32) and PEMGX (46.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGSAX | PEMGX | FGSAX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.91 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.366 | 6.969 | 177% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.86B | 33B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.91 | 9.01 | 321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.82 | 45.42 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.32 | 46.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.47 | 108.18 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement