Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PEMGX
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PEMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$59.04
Change-$6.38 (-9.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.86B
FGSAX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PEMGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. FGSAX (5.86B). FGSAX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FGSAX (41 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FGSAX (1.30) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FGSAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PEMGX (1000) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.78 vs. PEMGX (-11.39). FGSAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.71 vs. PEMGX (11.73).
| FGSAX | PEMGX | FGSAX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.91 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.090 | -2.946 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 29.5B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.78 | -11.39 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.92 | 20.37 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.71 | 11.73 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.69 | 115.63 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers