Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PCBIX
FGSAX vs PCBIX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PCBIX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$63.17
Change-$1.53 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.26B
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.20
Change-$0.72 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.99B
FGSAX vs PCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PCBIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PCBIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. FGSAX (5.26B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than FGSAX: PCBIX (0.12) vs FGSAX (0.00). FGSAX was incepted earlier than PCBIX: FGSAX (41 years) vs PCBIX (25 years). FGSAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PCBIX (0) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. PCBIX (-4.65). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. FGSAX (30.65).
| FGSAX | PCBIX | FGSAX / PCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.67 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.67 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.404 | 3.029 | 310% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.26B | 32B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | -4.65 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.37 | 35.68 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.65 | 33.05 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.63 | 111.81 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers