Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRSX vs VFWPX
FGRSX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGRSX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R6
Price$46.87
Change-$0.46 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.44
Change-$1.59 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
FGRSX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRSX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRSX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. FGRSX (1.59B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGRSX: VFWPX (2.70) vs FGRSX (1.46). FGRSX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGRSX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGRSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGRSX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). FGRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.57 vs. VFWPX (25.36). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 39.87 vs. FGRSX (31.32).
| FGRSX | VFWPX | FGRSX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.03 | 2,467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.324 | 29.164 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 2.70 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.57 | 25.36 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 50.03 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.32 | 39.87 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.54 | 79.71 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers