Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGROX vs WCMLX
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FGROX vs WCMLX
Emerald Growth Institutional
Price$32.08
Change+$1.96 (+6.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGROX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGROX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGROX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). FGROX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGROX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FGROX (17 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FGROX (0.80). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FGROX (45.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGROX: WCMLX (100000) vs FGROX (1000000). FGROX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.92 vs. WCMLX (8.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. FGROX (-14.27).
| FGROX | WCMLX | FGROX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.99 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.79 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.613 | 6.395 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 47.1M | 2,643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.92 | 8.52 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.71 | 19.51 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.27 | -5.30 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement