Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRCX vs VTSMX
FGRCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts FGRCX vs VTSMX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock C
Price$28.04
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.7B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$155.90
Change+$0.40 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
FGRCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. FGRCX (4.7B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than FGRCX: VTSMX (1.07) vs FGRCX (0.09). FGRCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: FGRCX (18 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). FGRCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). FGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). FGRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: FGRCX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). FGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.19 vs. VTSMX (20.39). FGRCX return over 5 years is better than : 104.93 vs. VTSMX (87.04).
| FGRCX | VTSMX | FGRCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.787 | 10.614 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.07 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.19 | 20.39 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.51 | 57.19 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.93 | 87.04 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.57 | 226.23 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement