FGPRB
Price
$135.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
245.94M
TOIPF
Price
$1.25
Change
+$0.25 (+25.00%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGPRB vs TOIPF

Header iconFGPRB vs TOIPF Comparison
Open Charts FGPRB vs TOIPFBanner chart's image
Ferrellgas Partners
Price$135.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7
Capitalization245.94M
Thai Oil Public
Price$1.25
Change+$0.25 (+25.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.27B
FGPRB vs TOIPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGPRB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGPRB vs. TOIPF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGPRB is a Hold and TOIPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FGPRB: $135.00 vs. TOIPF: $1.25)
Brand notoriety: FGPRB and TOIPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGPRB: 15% vs. TOIPF: 3%
Market capitalization -- FGPRB: $245.94M vs. TOIPF: $2.27B
FGPRB [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $245.94M. TOIPF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $2.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $49.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $6.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGPRB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTOIPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGPRB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TOIPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TOIPF is a better buy in the long-term than FGPRB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGPRB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOIPF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGPRB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TOIPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGPRB is a better buy in the short-term than TOIPF.

Price Growth

FGPRB (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -0.00% price change this week, while TOIPF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +25.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.55% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOIPF($2.27B) has a higher market cap than FGPRB($246M). FGPRB has higher P/E ratio than TOIPF: FGPRB (90.24) vs TOIPF (10.57). TOIPF YTD gains are higher at: 23.762 vs. FGPRB (7.991). TOIPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.4B vs. FGPRB (195M). TOIPF has more cash in the bank: 44.6B vs. FGPRB (109M). FGPRB has less debt than TOIPF: FGPRB (1.51B) vs TOIPF (172B). TOIPF has higher revenues than FGPRB: TOIPF (448B) vs FGPRB (1.94B).
FGPRBTOIPFFGPRB / TOIPF
Capitalization246M2.27B11%
EBITDA195M21.4B1%
Gain YTD7.99123.76234%
P/E Ratio90.2410.57854%
Revenue1.94B448B0%
Total Cash109M44.6B0%
Total Debt1.51B172B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TOIPF: Fundamental Ratings
TOIPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGPRBTOIPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGPRB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNINX54.560.07
+0.13%
Harbor International Retirement
CZMGX20.24-0.02
-0.10%
Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Inst
SCQGX97.39-0.26
-0.27%
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth S
VEXMX152.10-0.44
-0.29%
Vanguard Extended Market Index Investor
LMCSX32.81-0.23
-0.70%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4

FGPRB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGPRB and FGPR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGPRB and FGPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGPRB
1D Price
Change %
FGPRB100%
N/A
FGPR - FGPRB
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
DINO - FGPRB
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
PKCPY - FGPRB
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKCRU - FGPRB
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOIPF - FGPRB
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TOIPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TOIPF and CSAN have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOIPF and CSAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOIPF
1D Price
Change %
TOIPF100%
N/A
CSAN - TOIPF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
MOHCF - TOIPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCNTU - TOIPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKCPY - TOIPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKCRU - TOIPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More