FGPHF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
31.05M
FPLSF
Price
$8.75
Change
+$0.32 (+3.80%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
246.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGPHF vs FPLSF

Header iconFGPHF vs FPLSF Comparison
Open Charts FGPHF vs FPLSFBanner chart's image
First Graphene
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$823.54K
Capitalization31.05M
5N Plus
Price$8.75
Change+$0.32 (+3.80%)
Volume$13.98K
Capitalization246.9M
FGPHF vs FPLSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGPHF vs. FPLSF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGPHF is a Buy and FPLSF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FGPHF: $0.02 vs. FPLSF: $8.75)
Brand notoriety: FGPHF and FPLSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGPHF: 211% vs. FPLSF: 90%
Market capitalization -- FGPHF: $31.05M vs. FPLSF: $246.9M
FGPHF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $31.05M. FPLSF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $246.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGPHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPLSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPLSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPLSF is a better buy in the long-term than FGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGPHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPLSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FPLSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FGPHF and FPLSF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FGPHF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +23.92% price change this week, while FPLSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +7.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.16% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPLSF($247M) has a higher market cap than FGPHF($31.1M). FPLSF YTD gains are higher at: 76.549 vs. FGPHF (0.939). FPLSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.1M vs. FGPHF (-4.93M). FPLSF has more cash in the bank: 41.4M vs. FGPHF (8.05M). FGPHF has less debt than FPLSF: FGPHF (226K) vs FPLSF (151M). FPLSF has higher revenues than FGPHF: FPLSF (255M) vs FGPHF (842K).
FGPHFFPLSFFGPHF / FPLSF
Capitalization31.1M247M13%
EBITDA-4.93M14.1M-35%
Gain YTD0.93976.5491%
P/E RatioN/A21.01-
Revenue842K255M0%
Total Cash8.05M41.4M19%
Total Debt226K151M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGPHF vs FPLSF: Fundamental Ratings
FGPHF
FPLSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
9854
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGPHF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as FPLSF (91). This means that FGPHF’s stock grew similarly to FPLSF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGPHF (100). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGPHF (98). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGPHF (90). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGPHF (100). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGPHFFPLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBVAF0.080.01
+19.43%
Nubeva Technologies Ltd.
INTO0.25N/A
N/A
Initio, Inc.
JPHLF9.21N/A
N/A
JAPAN POST HLDGS CO LTD
DSITF1.57N/A
N/A
CURRYS PLC
NPIFF16.65-0.19
-1.13%
Northland Power, Inc.

FGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGPHF and ELMTY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGPHF and ELMTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGPHF
1D Price
Change %
FGPHF100%
+10.26%
ELMTY - FGPHF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EESE - FGPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIF - FGPHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMNSF - FGPHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPLSF - FGPHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.77%
More

FPLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPLSF and FSI have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPLSF and FSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPLSF
1D Price
Change %
FPLSF100%
+3.77%
FSI - FPLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-15.40%
GLGI - FPLSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIY - FPLSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
FLRAF - FPLSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGPHF - FPLSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+10.26%
More