FGOVF
Price
$1.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
554.1M
GRSLF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
107.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGOVF vs GRSLF

Header iconFGOVF vs GRSLF Comparison
Open Charts FGOVF vs GRSLFBanner chart's image
Freegold Ventures
Price$1.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$194.59K
Capitalization554.1M
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.25
Change+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization107.89M
FGOVF vs GRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGOVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGOVF vs. GRSLF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGOVF is a Hold and GRSLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FGOVF: $1.04 vs. GRSLF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: FGOVF and GRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGOVF: 86% vs. GRSLF: 111%
Market capitalization -- FGOVF: $554.1M vs. GRSLF: $107.89M
FGOVF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $554.1M. GRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $107.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGOVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGOVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FGOVF and GRSLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGOVF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRSLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGOVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GRSLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRSLF is a better buy in the short-term than FGOVF.

Price Growth

FGOVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -11.49% price change this week, while GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +17.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGOVF($554M) has a higher market cap than GRSLF($108M). GRSLF YTD gains are higher at: 127.186 vs. FGOVF (107.254). FGOVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -777.72K vs. GRSLF (-8.27M). FGOVF has more cash in the bank: 32.9M vs. GRSLF (2.12M). FGOVF (0) and GRSLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FGOVFGRSLFFGOVF / GRSLF
Capitalization554M108M513%
EBITDA-777.72K-8.27M9%
Gain YTD107.254127.18684%
P/E RatioN/A4.96-
Revenue00-
Total Cash32.9M2.12M1,550%
Total Debt49.5KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGOVF vs GRSLF: Fundamental Ratings
FGOVF
GRSLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
929
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGOVF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (74). This means that FGOVF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

FGOVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (100). This means that FGOVF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGOVF (92). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGOVF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as FGOVF (40). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to FGOVF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as FGOVF (100). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to FGOVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGOVFGRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGOVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVOCX21.380.29
+1.38%
Invesco Value Opportunities C
AXMIX16.040.17
+1.07%
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style I
MSCRX10.580.10
+0.95%
Madison Small Cap R6
QCSCX23.360.21
+0.91%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
WHGIX12.710.04
+0.32%
Westwood Income Opportunity Instl

FGOVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGOVF and WLBMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGOVF and WLBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGOVF
1D Price
Change %
FGOVF100%
N/A
WLBMF - FGOVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
AAGFF - FGOVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
LUCMF - FGOVF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
GRSLF - FGOVF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
ATUSF - FGOVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AGXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AGXPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
+3.54%
AGXPF - GRSLF
44%
Loosely correlated
-8.68%
AAGFF - GRSLF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
AZMCF - GRSLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
GLNCY - GRSLF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
GMBXF - GRSLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More