FGNX
Price
$7.07
Change
+$0.12 (+1.73%)
Updated
Sep 9, 12:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.23M
SLF
Price
$58.63
Change
+$0.18 (+0.31%)
Updated
Sep 9, 01:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.79B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGNX vs SLF

Header iconFGNX vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts FGNX vs SLFBanner chart's image
Fundamental Global
Price$7.07
Change+$0.12 (+1.73%)
Volume$135
Capitalization9.23M
Sun Life Financial
Price$58.63
Change+$0.18 (+0.31%)
Volume$100
Capitalization32.79B
FGNX vs SLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGNX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGNX vs. SLF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNX is a StrongBuy and SLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FGNX: $6.95 vs. SLF: $58.45)
Brand notoriety: FGNX and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGNX: 165% vs. SLF: 62%
Market capitalization -- FGNX: $9.23M vs. SLF: $32.79B
FGNX [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $9.23M. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $32.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $31.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGNX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGNX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the long-term than FGNX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGNX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGNX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the short-term than FGNX.

Price Growth

FGNX (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -50.36% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.02% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLF($32.8B) has a higher market cap than FGNX($9.23M). SLF YTD gains are higher at: -1.500 vs. FGNX (-68.119). SLF has more cash in the bank: 25.4B vs. FGNX (11.1M). FGNX has less debt than SLF: FGNX (3.46M) vs SLF (6.38B). SLF has higher revenues than FGNX: SLF (33.4B) vs FGNX (21.9M).
FGNXSLFFGNX / SLF
Capitalization9.23M32.8B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-68.119-1.5004,542%
P/E RatioN/A14.34-
Revenue21.9M33.4B0%
Total Cash11.1M25.4B0%
Total Debt3.46M6.38B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGNX vs SLF: Fundamental Ratings
FGNX
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9150
SMR RATING
1..100
7998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3662
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10049
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLF's Valuation (27) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGNX (78) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGNX’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGNX (91) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGNX’s over the last 12 months.

FGNX's SMR Rating (79) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SLF (98) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGNX’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

FGNX's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SLF (62) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGNX’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGNX (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGNX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGNXSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGNX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOAR1.580.06
+3.95%
Volato Group Inc.
IHG124.981.76
+1.43%
InterContinental Hotels Group Plc
FA16.170.11
+0.68%
First Advantage Corp
TARA3.07-0.08
-2.54%
Protara Therapeutics
VTLE15.75-0.65
-3.96%
Vital Energy

FGNX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGNX and FIHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGNX and FIHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGNX
1D Price
Change %
FGNX100%
-27.83%
FIHL - FGNX
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
SLF - FGNX
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
ESGRF - FGNX
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
ORI - FGNX
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
ACGLN - FGNX
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
+1.30%
ORI - SLF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
AEG - SLF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
BNT - SLF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
AIG - SLF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
ACGL - SLF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More