Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNCX vs VCRQX
FGNCX vs VCRQX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs VCRQX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$12.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets495.03M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class R6
Price$14.83
Change-$0.09 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
FGNCX vs VCRQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. VCRQX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a StrongBuy and VCRQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRQX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. FGNCX (495M). VCRQX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: VCRQX (2.09) vs FGNCX (1.31). FGNCX was incepted earlier than VCRQX: FGNCX (17 years) vs VCRQX (6 years). FGNCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than VCRQX (0.90). FGNCX (83.00) and VCRQX (81.00) have comparable annual turnover. VCRQX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: VCRQX (0) vs FGNCX (2500). VCRQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.88 vs. FGNCX (9.31). VCRQX return over 5 years is better than : 39.97 vs. FGNCX (26.21).
| FGNCX | VCRQX | FGNCX / VCRQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.90 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 0.90 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.260 | 15.440 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 495M | 1.39B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 2.09 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 11.88 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.27 | 30.30 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.21 | 39.97 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers