Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNCX vs VCRCX
FGNCX vs VCRCX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs VCRCX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$12.48
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets479.63M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure
Price$14.18
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets914.01M
FGNCX vs VCRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. VCRCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Hold and VCRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRCX has more cash in the bank: 914M vs. FGNCX (480M). FGNCX pays higher dividends than VCRCX: FGNCX (1.34) vs VCRCX (1.02). FGNCX was incepted earlier than VCRCX: FGNCX (17 years) vs VCRCX (6 years). VCRCX (2.10) and FGNCX (2.09) have similar cost to investors . FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. VCRCX (47.00). VCRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: VCRCX (1000) vs FGNCX (2500). VCRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.35 vs. FGNCX (16.20). VCRCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. FGNCX (32.96).
| FGNCX | VCRCX | FGNCX / VCRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.08 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 2.10 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.737 | 9.895 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 480M | 914M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.02 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.20 | 17.35 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.40 | 16.16 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 36.01 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement