Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNCX vs VCRCX
FGNCX vs VCRCX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs VCRCX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$12.51
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets476.85M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure
Price$14.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
FGNCX vs VCRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. VCRCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Hold and VCRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. FGNCX (477M). FGNCX pays higher dividends than VCRCX: FGNCX (1.33) vs VCRCX (1.00). FGNCX was incepted earlier than VCRCX: FGNCX (17 years) vs VCRCX (7 years). VCRCX (2.10) and FGNCX (2.09) have similar cost to investors . FGNCX (83.00) and VCRCX (81.00) have comparable annual turnover. VCRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: VCRCX (1000) vs FGNCX (2500). VCRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.19 vs. FGNCX (6.79). VCRCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. FGNCX (30.14).
| FGNCX | VCRCX | FGNCX / VCRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.08 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 2.10 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.008 | 11.445 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 477M | 1.31B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.00 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.79 | 8.19 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.90 | 17.15 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.14 | 37.18 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement