FGMCU
Price
$10.07
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MLAC
Price
$10.22
Change
-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
43.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGMCU vs MLAC

Header iconFGMCU vs MLAC Comparison
Open Charts FGMCU vs MLACBanner chart's image
FG Merger II
Price$10.07
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Volume$3.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Mountain Lake Acquisition
Price$10.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Volume$524
Capitalization43.29M
FGMCU vs MLAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGMCU vs. MLAC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGMCU is a Hold and MLAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FGMCU: $10.07 vs. MLAC: $10.22)
Brand notoriety: FGMCU and MLAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGMCU: 18% vs. MLAC: 1%
Market capitalization -- FGMCU: $0 vs. MLAC: $43.29M
FGMCU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. MLAC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $43.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGMCU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FGMCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FGMCU is a better buy in the long-term than MLAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGMCU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLAC’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGMCU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MLAC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGMCU is a better buy in the short-term than MLAC.

Price Growth

FGMCU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.10% price change this week, while MLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.66% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.84M vs. FGMCU (-2.41M). MLAC has more cash in the bank: 108K vs. FGMCU (6.28K). FGMCU has less debt than MLAC: FGMCU (845K) vs MLAC (3.38M). FGMCU (0) and MLAC (0) have equivalent revenues.
FGMCUMLACFGMCU / MLAC
CapitalizationN/A43.3M-
EBITDA-2.41M-1.84M131%
Gain YTDN/AN/A-
P/E RatioN/A26.25-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.28K108K6%
Total Debt845K3.38M25%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGMCUMLAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
9%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
2%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
5%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
7%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
32%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
7%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDT25.82N/A
N/A
Dillard's Capital Trust I
MKSI104.56-0.06
-0.06%
MKS Inc
ASTS45.60-0.11
-0.24%
AST SpaceMobile
BODI4.22-0.04
-0.94%
Beachbody Company (The)
NYAX50.44-1.08
-2.10%
Nayax Ltd

FGMCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGMCU and ATMV have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGMCU and ATMV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGMCU
1D Price
Change %
FGMCU100%
+0.10%
ATMV - FGMCU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMC - FGMCU
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLAC - FGMCU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLACU - FGMCU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FACT - FGMCU
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAC has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAC jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLAC
1D Price
Change %
MLAC100%
N/A
BOWNU - MLAC
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AIMUF - MLAC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMV - MLAC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPOU - MLAC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWN - MLAC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More