Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGKMX vs GTCCX
FGKMX vs GTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FGKMX vs GTCCX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesZ
Price$148.41
Change-$0.67 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
Gabelli Global Content & Connect C
Price$28.23
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.13M
FGKMX vs GTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGKMX vs. GTCCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGKMX is a Buy and GTCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGKMX has more cash in the bank: 2.64B vs. GTCCX (77.1M). GTCCX pays higher dividends than FGKMX: GTCCX (2.16) vs FGKMX (0.00). FGKMX was incepted earlier than GTCCX: FGKMX (7 years) vs GTCCX (26 years). GTCCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than FGKMX (0.58). FGKMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GTCCX (4.00). FGKMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTCCX: FGKMX (0) vs GTCCX (1000). FGKMX (23.36) and GTCCX (22.90) have marching annual gain over last year. FGKMX return over 5 years is better than : 78.92 vs. GTCCX (41.28).
| FGKMX | GTCCX | FGKMX / GTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.90 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.52 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.238 | 32.039 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 77.1M | 3,418% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.16 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.36 | 22.90 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 154.84 | 88.86 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.92 | 41.28 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement