Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGKMX vs FTUCX
FGKMX vs FTUCX Comparison
Open Charts FGKMX vs FTUCX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesZ
Price$143.16
Change+$0.26 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications C
Price$59.96
Change-$0.20 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.28M
FGKMX vs FTUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGKMX vs. FTUCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGKMX is a Buy and FTUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGKMX has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. FTUCX (233M). FTUCX pays higher dividends than FGKMX: FTUCX (1.04) vs FGKMX (0.00). FGKMX was incepted earlier than FTUCX: FGKMX (7 years) vs FTUCX (19 years). FTUCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FGKMX (0.58). FGKMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTUCX (40.00). FGKMX (0) and FTUCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGKMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.91 vs. FTUCX (11.78). FGKMX return over 5 years is better than : 94.24 vs. FTUCX (-3.10).
| FGKMX | FTUCX | FGKMX / FTUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.80 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.80 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.715 | 13.506 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 233M | 1,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.91 | 11.78 | 279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 146.34 | 49.04 | 298% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.24 | -3.10 | -3,039% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers