Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGJMX vs FTUCX
FGJMX vs FTUCX Comparison
Open Charts FGJMX vs FTUCX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesI
Price$139.59
Change-$0.34 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications C
Price$58.23
Change-$0.50 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.79M
FGJMX vs FTUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGJMX vs. FTUCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGJMX is a StrongBuy and FTUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGJMX has more cash in the bank: 2.64B vs. FTUCX (218M). FTUCX pays higher dividends than FGJMX: FTUCX (1.60) vs FGJMX (0.00). FGJMX was incepted earlier than FTUCX: FGJMX (7 years) vs FTUCX (19 years). FTUCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FGJMX (0.71). FGJMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTUCX (40.00). FGJMX (0) and FTUCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGJMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.09 vs. FTUCX (9.91). FGJMX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. FTUCX (-6.77).
| FGJMX | FTUCX | FGJMX / FTUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.80 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.80 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.814 | 10.808 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 218M | 1,209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.09 | 9.91 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 154.23 | 40.13 | 384% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.15 | -6.77 | -1,051% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement