Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGJMX vs FTUCX
FGJMX vs FTUCX Comparison
Open Charts FGJMX vs FTUCX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesI
Price$140.23
Change-$3.60 (-2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.9B
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications C
Price$63.80
Change-$0.76 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.44M
FGJMX vs FTUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGJMX vs. FTUCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGJMX is a Buy and FTUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGJMX has more cash in the bank: 2.9B vs. FTUCX (224M). FTUCX pays higher dividends than FGJMX: FTUCX (1.41) vs FGJMX (0.00). FGJMX was incepted earlier than FTUCX: FGJMX (7 years) vs FTUCX (19 years). FTUCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FGJMX (0.71). FGJMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTUCX (40.00). FGJMX (0) and FTUCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.65 vs. FGJMX (16.77). FGJMX return over 5 years is better than : 61.15 vs. FTUCX (0.64).
| FGJMX | FTUCX | FGJMX / FTUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.80 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.80 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.371 | 10.472 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 224M | 1,296% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.77 | 21.65 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.09 | 37.60 | 293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.15 | 0.64 | 9,488% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers