Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIWX vs TOLSX
FGIWX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FGIWX vs TOLSX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure R6
Price$12.75
Change-$0.47 (-3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets503.49M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$15.99
Change-$0.73 (-4.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets828.4M
FGIWX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIWX vs. TOLSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIWX is a Hold and TOLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 828M vs. FGIWX (503M). FGIWX pays higher dividends than TOLSX: FGIWX (2.30) vs TOLSX (2.07). FGIWX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FGIWX (10 years) vs TOLSX (18 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FGIWX (1.02). FGIWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TOLSX (30.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGIWX: TOLSX (2500) vs FGIWX (1000000). FGIWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.34 vs. TOLSX (8.88). FGIWX return over 5 years is better than : 31.98 vs. TOLSX (10.82).
| FGIWX | TOLSX | FGIWX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.11 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.21 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.721 | 4.305 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 503M | 828M | 61% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 2.07 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.34 | 8.88 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.51 | 10.97 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.98 | 10.82 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement