Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMFCX
FGIQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMFCX
Nomura Growth and Income R6
Price$18.57
Change+$1.39 (+8.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
FGIQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGIQX (1.75B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FGIQX: RMFCX (1.24) vs FGIQX (1.14). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGIQX (13 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.70). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FGIQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FGIQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. RMFCX (7.45). FGIQX return over 5 years is better than : 52.05 vs. RMFCX (44.16).
| FGIQX | RMFCX | FGIQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.965 | 2.244 | 355% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.24 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 7.45 | 304% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.13 | 28.73 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.05 | 44.16 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.36 | 105.79 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement