Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
Nomura Growth and Income R6
Price$18.12
Change+$0.15 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.83
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a Hold and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGIQX (1.55B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (1.54) vs RMEBX (1.03). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.70). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.16 vs. RMEBX (6.12). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.92 vs. FGIQX (44.00).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.935 | 15.326 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.03 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 6.12 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.35 | 27.12 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.00 | 50.92 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.32 | 88.58 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement