Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIQX vs RMEBX
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIQX vs RMEBX
Nomura Growth and Income R6
Price$18.57
Change+$1.39 (+8.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
FGIQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIQX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGIQX (1.75B). FGIQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIQX (1.14) vs RMEBX (1.08). FGIQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIQX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIQX (0.70). FGIQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FGIQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. RMEBX (7.30). FGIQX return over 5 years is better than : 52.05 vs. RMEBX (43.15).
| FGIQX | RMEBX | FGIQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.965 | 2.231 | 357% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.08 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 7.30 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.13 | 28.21 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.05 | 43.15 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.36 | 103.95 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement