Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMFEX
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$16.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.78
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FGIPX (1.49B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGIPX (2.01) vs RMFEX (1.49). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGIPX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. RMFEX (8.06). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. FGIPX (48.73).
| FGIPX | RMFEX | FGIPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.295 | 11.638 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.49 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.83 | 8.06 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.36 | 33.39 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.73 | 58.84 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.16 | 98.59 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement