Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMFCX
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFCX
Nomura Growth and Income Instl
Price$17.38
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGIPX (1.66B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGIPX (1.93) vs RMFCX (1.26). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGIPX (13 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.72 vs. RMFCX (11.33). RMFCX (44.17) and FGIPX (43.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGIPX | RMFCX | FGIPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.145 | 2.091 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.72 | 11.33 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.51 | 28.04 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.55 | 44.17 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.29 | 109.86 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement