Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMFCX
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFCX
Nomura Growth and Income Instl
Price$18.19
Change+$1.26 (+7.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGIPX (1.74B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGIPX (1.82) vs RMFCX (1.24). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGIPX (13 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.27 vs. RMFCX (7.45). FGIPX return over 5 years is better than : 50.57 vs. RMFCX (44.16).
| FGIPX | RMFCX | FGIPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.953 | 2.244 | 354% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.24 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.27 | 7.45 | 299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.34 | 28.73 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.57 | 44.16 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.55 | 105.79 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement