Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMFCX
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFCX
Nomura Growth and Income Instl
Price$17.70
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.18
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.34B
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. FGIPX (1.56B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGIPX (1.83) vs RMFCX (1.18). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGIPX (13 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.92 vs. RMFCX (5.51). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. FGIPX (43.71).
| FGIPX | RMFCX | FGIPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.994 | 14.983 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 113B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.18 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.92 | 5.51 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.88 | 27.11 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.71 | 52.85 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.21 | 89.59 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement