Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Nomura Growth and Income Instl
Price$17.38
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGIPX (1.66B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (1.93) vs RMEBX (1.10). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.72 vs. RMEBX (11.20). FGIPX (43.55) and RMEBX (43.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.145 | 2.096 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.10 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.72 | 11.20 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.51 | 27.52 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.55 | 43.18 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.29 | 108.13 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement