Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$15.48
Change-$0.14 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. FGIPX (1.43B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (2.31) vs RMEBX (1.16). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. FGIPX (3.53). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. FGIPX (43.21).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.230 | 5.923 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.31 | 1.16 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.53 | 8.54 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.68 | 27.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.21 | 58.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.39 | 68.22 | -33% |