Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Nomura Growth and Income Instl
Price$18.19
Change+$1.26 (+7.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGIPX (1.74B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (1.82) vs RMEBX (1.08). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.27 vs. RMEBX (7.30). FGIPX return over 5 years is better than : 50.57 vs. RMEBX (43.15).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.953 | 2.231 | 356% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.08 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.27 | 7.30 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.34 | 28.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.57 | 43.15 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.55 | 103.95 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement