Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$17.56
Change+$0.14 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGIPX (1.55B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (1.91) vs RMEBX (1.05). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIPX (6.59) and RMEBX (6.55) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. FGIPX (47.34).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.806 | 14.940 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.05 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 6.55 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.25 | 30.03 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.34 | 53.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.33 | 92.20 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement