Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFEX
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFEX
Nomura Growth and Income A
Price$17.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.45
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGINX (1.66B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGINX (1.66) vs RMFEX (1.53). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFEX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.47 vs. RMFEX (11.71). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.47 vs. FGINX (42.28).
| FGINX | RMFEX | FGINX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.140 | 2.111 | 149% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.53 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.47 | 11.71 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.55 | 29.27 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.28 | 46.47 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.77 | 118.51 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers