Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFEX
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$16.94
Change+$0.17 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FGINX (1.48B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGINX (1.63) vs RMFEX (1.46). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFEX (250) vs FGINX (1000). RMFEX (5.28) and FGINX (5.18) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. FGINX (47.97).
| FGINX | RMFEX | FGINX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.089 | 13.941 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.46 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.18 | 5.28 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.80 | 40.09 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.97 | 59.52 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.09 | 98.84 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement