Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFEX
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$16.37
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.41
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.61B
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FGINX (1.47B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGINX (1.82) vs RMFEX (1.51). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFEX (250) vs FGINX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. FGINX (6.49). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.15 vs. FGINX (45.94).
| FGINX | RMFEX | FGINX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.654 | 10.830 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.51 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.49 | 7.90 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.33 | 24.90 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.94 | 58.15 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.01 | 95.68 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement