Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFEX
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFEX
Nomura Growth and Income A
Price$18.26
Change-$0.14 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.90
Change-$0.49 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Hold and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGINX (1.59B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGINX (1.56) vs RMFEX (1.43). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFEX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.73 vs. RMFEX (9.19). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.31 vs. FGINX (46.99).
| FGINX | RMFEX | FGINX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.266 | 16.703 | 169% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.43 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.73 | 9.19 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.60 | 31.21 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.99 | 57.31 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.48 | 105.64 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement