Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFCX
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFCX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$17.47
Change-$0.11 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGINX (1.54B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGINX (1.63) vs RMFCX (1.21). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFCX (250) vs FGINX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. FGINX (6.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. FGINX (46.48).
| FGINX | RMFCX | FGINX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.550 | 15.093 | 149% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.21 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.30 | 6.67 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.40 | 30.56 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.48 | 54.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.64 | 94.04 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement