Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFCX
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFCX
Nomura Growth and Income A
Price$18.22
Change+$1.27 (+7.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGINX (1.75B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGINX (1.56) vs RMFCX (1.24). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFCX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.09 vs. RMFCX (7.45). FGINX return over 5 years is better than : 49.34 vs. RMFCX (44.16).
| FGINX | RMFCX | FGINX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.938 | 2.244 | 354% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.24 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.09 | 7.45 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.43 | 28.73 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.34 | 44.16 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.89 | 105.79 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement