Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFCX
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFCX
Nomura Growth and Income A
Price$17.10
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGINX (1.62B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGINX (1.56) vs RMFCX (1.18). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFCX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.35 vs. RMFCX (7.94). RMFCX (46.19) and FGINX (44.48) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGINX | RMFCX | FGINX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.204 | 9.715 | 198% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.18 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.35 | 7.94 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.28 | 28.72 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.48 | 46.19 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.28 | 90.34 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement