Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMEBX
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$16.37
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.35
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.61B
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FGINX (1.47B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGINX (1.82) vs RMEBX (1.11). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and FGINX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMEBX (250) vs FGINX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. FGINX (6.49). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.60 vs. FGINX (45.94).
| FGINX | RMEBX | FGINX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.654 | 10.520 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.11 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.49 | 7.43 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.33 | 23.23 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.94 | 54.60 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.01 | 86.61 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement