Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMEBX
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$16.94
Change+$0.17 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FGINX (1.48B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGINX (1.63) vs RMEBX (1.05). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and FGINX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMEBX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.18 vs. RMEBX (4.81). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. FGINX (47.97).
| FGINX | RMEBX | FGINX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.089 | 13.527 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.05 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.18 | 4.81 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.80 | 38.19 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.97 | 55.95 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.09 | 89.36 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement