FGHQF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 21 closing price
NBIO
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

FGHQF vs NBIO

Header iconFGHQF vs NBIO Comparison
Open Charts FGHQF vs NBIOBanner chart's image
Frontage
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100K
CapitalizationN/A
Nascent Biotech
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$114.84K
CapitalizationN/A
FGHQF vs NBIO Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGHQF vs. NBIO commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHQF is a Hold and NBIO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FGHQF: $0.10 vs. NBIO: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: FGHQF and NBIO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGHQF: 100% vs. NBIO: 105%
Market capitalization -- FGHQF: $267.84M vs. NBIO: $11.71M
FGHQF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $267.84M. NBIO’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $11.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $475.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGHQF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNBIO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGHQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NBIO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBIO is a better buy in the long-term than FGHQF.

Price Growth

FGHQF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NBIO (@Biotechnology) price change was -13.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

NBIO is expected to report earnings on Feb 14, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-2.07% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGHQF($268M) has a higher market cap than NBIO($11.7M). NBIO YTD gains are higher at: -60.671 vs. FGHQF (-69.073).
FGHQFNBIOFGHQF / NBIO
Capitalization268M11.7M2,291%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-69.073-60.671114%
P/E Ratio34.83N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBIO: Fundamental Ratings
NBIO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FGHQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGHQF has been loosely correlated with DARE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGHQF jumps, then DARE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGHQF
1D Price
Change %
FGHQF100%
N/A
DARE - FGHQF
45%
Loosely correlated
-7.04%
SAGE - FGHQF
31%
Poorly correlated
-6.28%
LPCN - FGHQF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
ARMP - FGHQF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
LGVN - FGHQF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More

NBIO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBIO and QLGN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBIO and QLGN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBIO
1D Price
Change %
NBIO100%
-15.69%
QLGN - NBIO
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
FGHQF - NBIO
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRZM - NBIO
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPSYF - NBIO
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLLCF - NBIO
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More