Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGGBX vs RIDAX
FGGBX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FGGBX vs RIDAX
Templeton Global Dynamic Income R6
Price$2.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.96M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$27.26
Change+$0.09 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.1B
FGGBX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGGBX vs. RIDAX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGGBX is a Hold and RIDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FGGBX (310M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than RIDAX: FGGBX (3.30) vs RIDAX (2.87). FGGBX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: FGGBX (12 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). RIDAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). RIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). RIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: RIDAX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.97 vs. RIDAX (8.51). RIDAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.65 vs. FGGBX (31.27).
| FGGBX | RIDAX | FGGBX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.36 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.36 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.037 | 14.012 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310M | 138B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.30 | 2.87 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.97 | 8.51 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 37.79 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.27 | 36.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.78 | 50.62 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement