Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFRX vs VFWPX
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFRX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R
Price$46.40
Change-$0.46 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.44
Change-$1.59 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFRX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFRX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. FGFRX (1.59B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFRX: VFWPX (2.70) vs FGFRX (1.06). FGFRX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFRX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFRX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFRX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). FGFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. VFWPX (25.36). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 39.87 vs. FGFRX (29.24).
| FGFRX | VFWPX | FGFRX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.03 | 4,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.03 | 5,467% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.269 | 29.164 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 2.70 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.51 | 25.36 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.11 | 50.03 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | 39.87 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.37 | 79.71 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement