Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFRX vs VFWPX
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFRX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R
Price$46.39
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$163.21
Change-$0.18 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.2B
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFRX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFRX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. FGFRX (1.66B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFRX: VFWPX (2.93) vs FGFRX (1.92). FGFRX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFRX (13 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFRX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). FGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFRX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.29 vs. FGFRX (29.60). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.77 vs. FGFRX (20.04).
| FGFRX | VFWPX | FGFRX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.03 | 4,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.03 | 5,467% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.920 | 6.471 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 78.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.93 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.60 | 34.29 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 47.98 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.04 | 34.77 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.33 | 110.45 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement